CR Blog
Nike's new football mark
Posted by Gavin Lucas, 18 November 2009, 18:27 Permalink Comments (38)

London-based design studio (and previous CR One To Watch) Accept & Proceed has created a new mark for Nike Football Training...

The new mark, known as the Nike HyperCube, will be applied to all football training-related products and materials from now on. While the mark will mostly appear printed on product in just two dimensions, it was conceived as a four-dimensional tetrahedron, A&P say.
Why? According to Accept & Proceed's David Johnston, "Arsene Wenger describes the four factors making up a great football player as being Technical, Physical, Tactical and Mental." Hence the decision to try to produce a mark in four dimensions. (If you'd like an explanation of four-dimensional Euclidian space, and we know you would, click here).
This animation shows the mark in motion:


Credits:
Client: Phil Dickinson, global creative director, Nike Football
Design agency: Accept & Proceed
Design/concept: David Johnston, Matthew Jones, Kasper Lahti
38 Comments
Also known as a tesseract isn't it? Someone's been reading Alex Garland.
I like it a lot.
2009-11-19 10:51:19
Lovely work. Great stuff guys. Much nicer than the old one.
2009-11-19 10:54:40
meh
2009-11-19 11:32:22
if you want to see something really arresting, then have a look at a 4d cube rotating:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l_jKXFSgZAQ
(can i post youtube links here? it's work safe)
2009-11-19 11:51:55
I always thought the 4th dimension was duration (time)?
2009-11-19 11:53:57
kind of looks like a games console logo, suggests futuristic and realistic gaming!
2009-11-19 11:55:54
Great logo, I'm amazed that they got away with dropping the swoosh out.
2009-11-19 12:06:35
The fourth dimension isn't time, unless you're talking spacetime. Accept & Proceed are applying the Euclidian 4th dimension, which is just another directional axis. So imagine instead of x, y and z, imagine w, x, y and z.
Which is all well and good, but it's just clever talk to help sell in a cool-looking logo. Your average chav in Batley that's going to buy the 'apparel' with the logo on it doesn't care. He just wants a smart logo. So job done i suppose.
2009-11-19 12:29:42
like the idea, but the execution to me just seems cool in a scientific way but not so, in a related-to-football way.
Also the actual Hypercube looks more 3D than 4D.
Bold decsion by Nike, but really the top will likely be plastered in carefully positioned swooshes so why would this mark need one.
2009-11-19 12:40:53
Inspirational and dynamic, this logo is really setting the pace for graphic design in sport!
Animation is also very cool.
Nice one.
2009-11-19 12:51:03
typical nike football, what they lack in heritage they make up for in aggression.
i always played football with a ball, yet here we are raving about a cube, the contradiction is glaring in my eyes.
2009-11-19 13:43:08
I also thought it was time. Maybe thats just applied in Motion Graphics??
2009-11-19 15:42:42
I am really not a fan of this. It just looks like a generic block to me with no flavour. Surely they could come up with something that's going to be more recognizable at small sizes and from far away? At the very least the "ligher" areas need to be lighter to contrast better with the dark ones. With any lack of definition, it's just going to degrade into a hexagon.
2009-11-19 16:33:48
Very nice, kudos for not including a ball.
2009-11-19 16:34:44
Seems a bit busy, but really cool reminds me of Paul Rands IBM logo. Once the people have been educated on the new brand, and it becomes recognizable, it will fulfill it's job. (Regardless of what is used to identify the product) It could have been a cube, a dot, an ellipse. Brand requires education through extensive marketing. I actually like the cube that starts of the video too, the plain one with no lines. But it's all cool stuff
2009-11-19 16:37:06
Hmmm... Not sure.
"While the mark will mostly appear printed on product in just two dimensions, it was conceived as a four-dimensional tetrahedron, A&P say."
Surely that doesn't make much sense, the main usage should inform the final design in my opinion. You wouldn't get away with designing a mark that relies on color if it was only going to be used in black and white. This looks nice animated but on the sleeve it looks quite messy, and indistinguishable. The many lines and central axis aren't easy on the eye.
I like the stuff that A&P do, and the idea behind this mark but feel this needs a little bit more development to work in 2D.
2009-11-19 17:53:14
Its not bad, at the standard that you expect from nike.
2009-11-19 21:57:32
I have much respect for A&P but I can't get past the similarities:
http://unity3d.com
I suppose one could speculate that not many aspiring athletes spend their nights developing computer games, nor do they have an interest in Euclidian space.
2009-11-19 23:42:43
Me likey!
The outline of the cube reminds me a bit of a shield / crest, which used to be the in-thing to have on footy shirts. It also looks a bit like the tranformers logo (especially with the font they use in the video).
Really need to see the branding in action before making judgement on it though.
2009-11-20 09:26:13
Mmmmmm... all those stripes remind me of the adidas logo...
2009-11-20 10:38:49
@Paul
I don't get what you're saying. The fourth dimension IS time. There's no fourth axis, what would that even mean/represent?
I always thought 4D in this context was used by video game companies in the 90's to make things sound ultra futuristic.
2009-11-20 13:44:25
It's ok. Not sure how it represents football. But it's an interesting shape. Quite brave of them to go with something so detailed that will appear very small on a lot of their clothing - detail which will get lost in the fabric fibres possibly. Grumble grumble. It's ok, it'll grow on me.
2009-11-20 14:00:18
This logo bends my mind
I just can't understand it. I don't know if it's genius or misguided.
I agree with 'I am Sam' that opting for a cube to dipict football seems like a contradiction and the fact that the sample on the player's sleeve, has the swoosh slapped next to it would indicate the application has not been well considered.
None the less, it's very brave and sticks in my head. I have not seen anything like it, in sports branding. Which makes me think: I like it.
Odd one.
I think.
2009-11-20 14:40:41
Great logo. Technical, Physical, Tactical and Mental makes sense too. Appeals to me more than the old one
2009-11-20 14:52:36
Interesting. Seeing it in the image on the shirt, looks nice.. almost like a shield.
I find it very interesting that it got through to production the way it is....
Somebody just mentioned that it looks like a Mitsubishi logo in a cage... also interesting....
All in all, an interesting development.
2009-11-20 16:07:43
No idea what it represents. To emotion behind it, way to technical. Football is all about feeling and emotion not about mechanics and technology.
2009-11-20 17:03:13
nice work david & matt. x
2009-11-20 18:03:42
Impressive new mark by nike, good to see them branching away from the classic but sometimes overused swoosh ident. Definately a sign of things to come in the future. I have just set up my own site as part of my Graphic & Communication Design degree at Leeds University: feel free to check it out and tell me what you think. Cheers.
2009-11-20 18:27:19
I wonder if there marketing scheme is to make something drastically different to stick in the minds of people. . . so weird and different that we remember it, and associate it with Football.
Kind of like how stripes are associated with computers because the logo of a great computer company is striped, for some odd reason - IBM.
This logo may succeed and stick in the minds of people for being weird and different. It will become a item of conversation. So in that sense, way to go Nike I guess.
2009-11-20 19:43:37
This...thing is a horseplay.
2009-11-21 13:12:30
Paul Rand said “a good logo is good will”
There always is extensive marketing, and brilliant product/service and consistency behind every example of a great logo. Having said that, i do believe that there should be logical connect between form and communication.
I don’t like this for various reasons, i mean before seeing the video i did not see the form as a four-dimensional tetrahedron. The execution with swoosh is an afterthought (or looks like it). Its football, Why so edgy?
lets see how it goes...
:)
2009-11-22 05:05:04
impeccable as always. well done a&p
2009-11-22 12:36:59
The rationale behind it I like. Trying to communicate the four dimensions of a football player is a good idea. However, they did not communicate this with the symbol. The symbol shows three points when static and vaguely shows four when animated. In no way shape or form does it communicate Technical, Physical, Tactical and Mental.
It's ok stating what the goal is but do try and score.
2009-11-22 16:27:18
Over-complicated rubbish. Looks like a Mercedes badge after 16 pints.
2009-11-23 14:57:31
I quite like the mark, but it says nothing about football (or anything!) at a glance. So I only saw what the designers were implying by reading the article. 99.99% of the population won't be doing that, so its hard to call it a success!
2009-11-24 09:27:15
I like it, and I'd wear it.
It's like a bold, modern shield, and it's nice to see something a little unpredictable for a football mark, a circle would be way too predictable for a brand like Nike. Very Accept and Proceed.
2009-11-24 11:30:49
no swosh? that isn't going to last much
2009-11-24 13:32:45
I think the 'euclidian' explanation was probably just a bit of ambulatory presentation sell-in patter (in response to all these questions about the fourth dimension) and if you put that aside and just consider the logo for what it is, personally I think its great. It seems to fit in the general Nike visual language, and it seems to me to be a perfect example of doing what seems to be utterly wrong (a football is round, what if we did a square instead). It deals with the space in which football takes place rather than the dynamics of the activity itself, which says to me "its about the event, not the product" and then finally it nods to the dynamic with a sense of movement, depth and direction.
As for the question of whether it will reproduce on apparel, I doubt very much it would have got this far without being tested on product.
It would be tempting to try and have something bouncing around inside that space maybe, but perhaps that would just get too messy.
2009-11-27 10:32:44
| Dog Days Are Over (9) |
| Decision time for the RCA (31) |
| The new look BJP (15) |
| YouTube and creative suicide (8) |
| PhotoSketch (18) |
| Penguin Classics team up with (RED) for typographic covers |
| Tom Gauld on Diet Coke |
| iGlass mate? That'll be extra |
| Go Faster: The Graphic Design of Racing Cars |
| New Gorillaz video |
| Advertising | (642) | |
| Art | (185) | |
| Books | (137) | |
| Digital | (200) | |
| Graphic Design | (527) | |
| Illustration | (247) | |
| Magazine / Newspaper | (92) | |
| Music Video / Film | (496) | |
| Photography | (184) | |
| Type / Typography | (130) |
